Great Stuff at Daily Kos
[..]
We are not debating "how much power we should cede the White House." There is no debate. The Constitution provides for that. Last I looked, no one has proposed a constitutional amendment.
On Bush's illegal domestic warrantless surveillance, no one is debating how to "strike a balance between civil liberties and national security." That debate is the Patriot Act debates - the previous one in 2002 and the current one raging.
Indeed, there is no real debate about the Bush Administration's illegal acts. No serious person is adopting or defending the nonsensical views of John Yoo and Dick Cheney that the War on Terror has made Bush King. The defenses are preposterous and everyone who knows a little bit about the subject knows there is no serious debate.
[...]
We are not debating "how much power we should cede the White House." There is no debate. The Constitution provides for that. Last I looked, no one has proposed a constitutional amendment.
On Bush's illegal domestic warrantless surveillance, no one is debating how to "strike a balance between civil liberties and national security." That debate is the Patriot Act debates - the previous one in 2002 and the current one raging.
Indeed, there is no real debate about the Bush Administration's illegal acts. No serious person is adopting or defending the nonsensical views of John Yoo and Dick Cheney that the War on Terror has made Bush King. The defenses are preposterous and everyone who knows a little bit about the subject knows there is no serious debate.
[...]
posted by TheFuriousGourmet | 5:12 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home