Republican Politician Interferes with CDC panel on Sexually Transmitted disease
[...]
Rep. Mark Souder, R-Ind., who chairs the House subcommittee on drug policy, questioned the balance of the original panel, which focused on the failure of abstinence-until-marriage programs. In e-mail to Health and Human Services officials, his office asked whether the CDC was "clear about the controversial nature of this session and its obvious anti-abstinence objective."
A panel about the failure of abstinence until marriage programs must contain panelists who claim abstinence programs work? So the idea is not to discuss accurate inforamtion for the common good, but to advacne the Bush, right wing, theocratic agenda at the expense of the public good?
Last week the title of the panel was changed and two members were replaced. One of them was a Penn State student who was going to talk about how abstinence programs were tied to rising STD rates.
[...]
"At the CDC, they're beside themselves," said Jonathan Zenilman, president of the American Sexually Transmitted Diseases Association and conference organizer. "These people aren't scientists; they haven't written anything. The only reason they're here is because of political pressure from the administration."
Neither of the new speakers -- Patricia Sulak, an ob/gyn and director of the Worth the Wait program, and Eric Walsh, a California physician -- went through the peer-review process required of other participants, although CDC officials did not explain why. Both panelists were funded by the HHS, although others said they were told they had to pay their own way.
[...]
Oster was called last week and told she would not be on the panel, where she was going to talk about how abstinence programs were tied to rising STD rates.
"It absolutely scares me," she said, "that there's this pressure to eliminate viable research from a professional conference."
Later, a representative from the office of Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla.) criticized her work in an e-mail message.
Coburn spokesman John Hart questioned why the CDC would present data that contradict the administration's policy.
Of course, we wouldn't want to present the truth. We only want to present administration policy compatible truths, even though administration policy is based on delusions and megalomania.
Sexually transmitted Disease through the lens of those who claim Iraq is a great success.
"I'm not suggesting that their views shouldn't be debated," he said, "but should federally funded tax dollars be used to do that?"
The new panel is titled "Public Health Strategies of Abstinence Programs for Youth."
[...]
This is how Christian girls get rectal herpes.
Rep. Mark Souder, R-Ind., who chairs the House subcommittee on drug policy, questioned the balance of the original panel, which focused on the failure of abstinence-until-marriage programs. In e-mail to Health and Human Services officials, his office asked whether the CDC was "clear about the controversial nature of this session and its obvious anti-abstinence objective."
A panel about the failure of abstinence until marriage programs must contain panelists who claim abstinence programs work? So the idea is not to discuss accurate inforamtion for the common good, but to advacne the Bush, right wing, theocratic agenda at the expense of the public good?
Last week the title of the panel was changed and two members were replaced. One of them was a Penn State student who was going to talk about how abstinence programs were tied to rising STD rates.
[...]
"At the CDC, they're beside themselves," said Jonathan Zenilman, president of the American Sexually Transmitted Diseases Association and conference organizer. "These people aren't scientists; they haven't written anything. The only reason they're here is because of political pressure from the administration."
Neither of the new speakers -- Patricia Sulak, an ob/gyn and director of the Worth the Wait program, and Eric Walsh, a California physician -- went through the peer-review process required of other participants, although CDC officials did not explain why. Both panelists were funded by the HHS, although others said they were told they had to pay their own way.
[...]
Oster was called last week and told she would not be on the panel, where she was going to talk about how abstinence programs were tied to rising STD rates.
"It absolutely scares me," she said, "that there's this pressure to eliminate viable research from a professional conference."
Later, a representative from the office of Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla.) criticized her work in an e-mail message.
Coburn spokesman John Hart questioned why the CDC would present data that contradict the administration's policy.
Of course, we wouldn't want to present the truth. We only want to present administration policy compatible truths, even though administration policy is based on delusions and megalomania.
Sexually transmitted Disease through the lens of those who claim Iraq is a great success.
"I'm not suggesting that their views shouldn't be debated," he said, "but should federally funded tax dollars be used to do that?"
The new panel is titled "Public Health Strategies of Abstinence Programs for Youth."
[...]
This is how Christian girls get rectal herpes.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home